The Effect of Profitability, Company Size, Solvency, and Public Accounting Firm Size to Audit Delay on Mining Companies
Keywords:
Previous Audit Opinion, Debt Default, Size of Public Accounting Firm, Audit GenderAbstract
The purpose of this research is to know and analyze the effect of determinants such as previous audit opinion, debt default, audit gender, and size of public accounting firm on the acceptance of going concern audit opinion on mining company which listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2018. Population on this research are all mining companies that listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2017-2018. Total of observed data in this research is 76 companies. Sampling is done by using purposive sampling method that chosen by certain criteria. Based on the research and data analysis technique using regression analysis with SPSS Application, it shows that previous audit opinion, audit gender, and size of public accounting firm has no significant effect ongoing concern audit opinion. While debt default has a significant effect on going concern audit opinion. The implication from the result above is the result of the analysis show that the variable which play a significant role and have significant effect according to the hypothesis is debt default. So this variable must absolutely be a consideration for auditor in the decision process of giving going concern audit opinion, because it can show the ability of the company to pay their debt at due date which can affect operational activity of a company. To decrease the chance of accepting non going concern audit opinion, the company can increase their current assets, and also decrease their current liabilities. And then for the variable which don’t play a significant role and have no significant effect if according to the hypothesis are previous audit opinion, audit gender, and size of public accounting firm. Even the effect of those variable were not significant, it also must be a consideration for the auditor in decide the audit opinion for a company, and must be a consideration for the third party in deciding which company they want to invest.
References
Darmansyah. 2018. Determinan Auditor Opinion on Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur dan Pertambangan Terdaftar pada Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jakarta : Jurnal Ilmiah WIDYA Ekonomika.
M Nur F. 2015. Pengaruh Audit Tenure, Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya, dan Disclosure Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern : Akuntabilitas Vol. VII No. 3, Desember.
Fatihatur R and Sukirman. 2018. The Determinants that Affect the Acceptance of Going Concern Audit Opinion with Auditor Reputation as a Moderating Variable. Semarang : Accounting Analysis Journal.
Dody H and Tiara R. 2018. Does Audit Quality Mediate the Effect of Auditor Tenure, Abnormal Audit Fee and Auditor's Reputation on Giving Going Concern Opinion?. Yogyakarta : International Journal od Economics and Financial Issues.
Sarowar H, Larelle C, Gary S. 2016. Does auditor gender affect issuing going-concern decisions for financially distressed clients?. Australia : Research Gate.
Diane B and Joel B. 2009. The Effects of Auditor Gender on Audit Quality. Brussel : The Icfai University Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices.
Cheryl Y and Gatot I. 2014. Analisis Pengaruh Reputasi KAP, Audit Tenure, Ukuran Perusahaan, Opinion Shopping, Prediksi Kebangkrutan, dan Audit Lag terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di BEI periode 2006-2012. Jakarta : Universitas Bina Nusantara.
Emiliano R, Nieves G, Cristina D, and Maria A. 2004. Audit Quality and the Going-concern Decision-making Process: Spanish Evidence. Spain : European Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 4, 597-620.
Leny P. 2009. The Influence of Previous Audit Opinion Going Concern, Audit Quality and Company’s Factors to Audit Opinion Going Concern. Thesis : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember.
Istikharoh. 2019. Opini Audit Going Concern (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Pertambangan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013-2017). Thesis : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Surakarta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Metodelogi penelitian. Yogyakarta : Bina Aksara.
Ritonga, Rahman. 1997. Statistika untuk Penelitian Psikologi dan Penelitian. Jakarta : Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi UI.
Sugiyono. 2003. Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung : Pusat Bahasa Depdiknas.
Narita I. 2016. BEI Kaji Kembali Penilaian Going Concern Emiten. Accessed on May 12, 2019 from https://investasi.kontan.co.id/news/bei-kaji-kembali-penilaian-going-concern-emiten.
Syahrizal S. 2017. Delisting Empat Emiten, Ini Alasan BEI. Accessed on May 12, 2019 from http://www.tribunnews.com/bisnis/2017/10/20/delisting-empat-emiten-ini-alasan-bei.
Martin B. 2017. Ambil Tindakan Tegas, BEI Bakal Delisting Saham Berau Coal. Accessed on March 24, 2019 from https://economy.okezone.com/read/2017/10/18/278/1797796/ambil-tindakan-tegas-bei-bakal-delisting-saham-berau-coal.
Daniel R. 2016. PwC: Tahun 2015 Sebagai Tahun Terburuk Bagi Sektor Pertambangan. Accessed on March 24, 2019 from https://www.pwc.com/id/en/media-centre/pwc-in-news/2016/indonesian/pwc--tahun-2015-sebagai-tahun-terburuk-bagi-sektor-pertambangan.html.
Issa A. 2017. Saham BRAU dan TKGA Resmi Delisting November, Begini Historis Pergerakannya. Accesed on March 24, 2019 from https://m.bareksa.com/id/text/2017/10/19/saham-brau-dan-tkga-resmi-delisting-november-begini-historis-pergerakannya/17050/news
Kenton, Will. 2019. Current Ratio. Accesed on March 24, 2019 : Investopedia. From https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currentratio.asp
