Menyibak Problematika Badan Usaha Milik Desa: Studi Etnometodologi

Authors

  • Iman Waskito Universitas Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
  • Lalu Takdir Jumaidi Universitas Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
  • M. Ali Fikri Universitas Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53512/valid.v22i1.412

Keywords:

bumdes, dualism, ethnomethodology, financial reporting

Abstract

This research aims to understand the problems of managing Village BUM. This research uses an interpretive paradigm with ethnomethodology as the methodology. The data collection techniques used in this research were observation, interviews, and documentation. The informants from this research were three people, namely the Village Head, the Chair of the Village BUM, and the Village BUM Treasurer. The results of this research show that there are at least three internal problems with BUM Desa. First, the preparation of financial reports was neglected. The results of the data analysis show that this problem is due to a lack of education and training for employees in carrying out their duties and responsibilities. However, this problem is only the impact of the next two problems. Second, the mechanism for changing the chairman of BUM Desa. The change of chairman of BUMDesa, which is the appointment of the Village Head, has the potential for a conflict of political interest in retribution. This conflict is very vulnerable to ignoring the principle of professionalism in every process of appointing a new BUMDesa chairman. Third, leadership dualism. The existence of a village head, who should encourage the form of allocation of village funds and stimulants for policies that stimulate BUMDesa business, should not interfere and even be considered a shadow chairman.

References

Amal, M. K. (2010). Etnometodologi Harold Garfinkel. In Suyanto, B., and Amal, M.K. Anatomi dan Perkembangan Teori Sosial. Malang: Aditya Media.

De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., & Cassia, L. (2015). ‘Product Innovation in Family Versus Nonfamily firms: An Exploratory Analysis’. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12068

Djaddang, S., & Kusumawardhani, D. (2019). Pasca Kondisi Implementasi Akuntansi Berbasis Akrual Pada Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan Kementerian Keuangan: Studi Etnometodologi. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Perpajakan), 6(2), 57–68.

Freund, P., & Abrams, M. (1976). Ethnomethodology and Marxism: Their Use for Critical Theorizing. Theory & Society, 3(3), 377–393.

Harmoni, A. (2013). Stakeholder-Based Analysis of Sustainability Report: A Case Study on Mining Companies in Indonesia. International Conference on Eurasian Economies 2013, 40, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.36880/c04.00704

Hartono, Rudy. (2021). The heart and soul of the company/ organization is creativity and innovation. https://djpb.kemenkeu.go.id/kppn/baturaja/id/data-publikasi/artikel/2928-BUM Desa-bina-mandiri-bertahan-dengan-kreativitas-dan-inovasi-demi-memajukan-perekonomian-desa-windusari.html#:~:text=Pada%20tahun%202021%20jumlah%20BUM Desa,12.040%20BUM Desa%20yang%20tidak%20aktif. Diakses 16/03/2023

Hastowiyono, Suharyanto, Yunanto, S. E. & Forum Pengembangan Pembaharuan Desa. (2014). Penyusunan kelayakan usaha & pengembangan usaha BUM Desa. Jakarta:Indo Press

Hermansyah (2015),“Peran Kepala Desa dalam Pelaksanaan Pembngunan Kecamatan Tana Lia Kabupaten Tana Tidung (Studi Kasus di Desa Tanah Merah dan Desa Sambungan)”. eJournal Pemerintahan Integratif.

Hilber, R.A. (2012). Etnometodologi dan Teori Sosial. In Turner, B.S. Teori Sosial dari Klasik sampai Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI). (2011). Standar Profesional Akuntan. Publik. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Kementrian Desa dan Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal dan Transmigrasi (2022). BUM Desa dan BUM Desa Bersama Nasional. https://sid.kemendesa.go.id/BUM Desa diakses 16/03/2023

Ikriyati, T., & Aprila, N. (2019). Pengaruh Penerapan Standar Akuntansi Pemerintah, Implementasi Sistem Informasi Manajemen Daerah, dan Sistem Pengendalian Internal Pemerintah Terhadap Kualitas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Seluma. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.9.2.131-140

Kamayanti, A. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi: Pengantar Religiositas Keilmuan. Ed. Revisi. Penerbit Peneleh.

Kusuma, Gabriella Hanny dan Purnamasari Nurul. (2016a). “Jurnal Penelitian BUM Desa: Kewirausahaan Sosial Yang Berkelanjutan, Penabulu Jakarta. Accessed from http://jembatan.tiga.com/wp-content/uploads/BUM Desa-Kewirausahaan-Sosial-yang-Berkelanjutan.pdf ”

Kusuma, G., & Purnamasari, N. (2016b). Membangun Gerakan Desa Wirausaha. Yogyakarta. Penabulu Foundation.

Liang, S. (2021). Research on the application of computer technology in enterprise financial management. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1915(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1915/3/032038

Llewellyn, N., & Hindmarsh, J. (2010). Organisation, Interaction and Practice. Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26(3), 336–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCAMAN.2010.05.002

Lynch, M. (1997). scientific practice and ordinary action: ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge University Press.

Mayu, & Adlin. (2016). ‘Faktor-Faktor yang Menghambat Tumbuh Dan Berkembangnya Badan Usaha Milik Desa Di Desa Pematang Tebih Kecamatan Ujung Batu Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Tahun 2014 –2015’.

Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’. In Source: The Academy of Management Review (Vol. 22, Issue 4).

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Revisi, Vol. 38). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyadi. (2017). Sistem Akuntansi. Edisi Keempat. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Ritzer, G. (2015). Etnometodologi dalam Ilmu Sosial. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Romney, Marshall B. dan Paul John Steinbart (2018). Accounting Information System. Fourteenth Edition. Pearson Education Limit: New Jersey.

Silalahi, U. (2009). Metode Penelitian Sosial. PT Refika Aditama.

Suarez, K., Perez, P., & Almeida, D. (2001) The Succession Process From a Resource and Knowledge Based View of Family Firms. Family Business Review, XIV(1).

Subrata, Hendra Prasetya, Sulistyo Sulistyo, dan Doni Wirshandono Yogivaria (2016). Faktor Kendala Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan pada Usaha Mikro Kecil dan Menengah Kue Nikmat Rasa. https://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/jrma/index

Sumaryadi & Saputra. (2017). Faktor-faktor yang menghambat Tumbuh dan Berkembangnya Badan Usaha Milik Desa di Desa Pematang Tebih Kecamatan Ujung Batu Kabupaten Rokan Hulu.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sumaryadi, I. N., & Saputra, R. (2017). ‘The Role Of The Village Business Agency As Creative Economic Implementation in Order of Community Empowerment of Villages Of Cagak Road Subang District West Java Province’. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 15(1). www.jitbm.com

Wijaya, R. E. (2021). Vernacular Accounting: Mengungkap Keunikan Komunikasi dalam Sistem Informasi Akuntansi (V. N. Rahmanti, Ed.). Penerbit Peneleh.

Wijoyo, H., Ariyanto, A., Sudarsono, A., & Wijayanti, K. D. (2021). Sistem Informasi Manajemen (M. F. Akbar, Ed.; Pertama). ICM Publisher.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-21

How to Cite

Waskito, I., Jumaidi, L. T., & Fikri, M. A. (2024). Menyibak Problematika Badan Usaha Milik Desa: Studi Etnometodologi. Valid: Jurnal Ilmiah, 22(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.53512/valid.v22i1.412

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.